Question: You are a frog in a pond that has infinitely many lily pads, which are numbered $1$, $2$, $3$, etc in a row. You are currently on pad $2$, and your goal is to make it to pad $1$, which you would happily stay on forever.

Whenever you are on pad $k$, you will hop to pad $(k−1)$ with probability $1/k$, and you will hop to pad $(k+1)$ with probability $(k−1)/k$.

What is the probability that you will ultimately make it to pad $1$?

(Fiddler on the Proof)

Solution

On any given lilypad, we can step to the left or to the right. So, the probability we reach pad $1$ is always equal to the probability we step to the left and go on to reach pad $1$ plus the probability we step to the right and go on to reach pad $1$.

Starting from pad $2$ we can step with equal probability directly to pad $1$, ending the quest, or to pad $3$. We can write this as the equation

\[P_2 = \frac12 + \frac12 P_3,\]

where $P_j$ is the probability that we eventually reach pad $1$ from pad $j$. If we start on pad $1$, we’re already there, so $P_1 = 1.$

From lilypad $3$, we can step left with probability $\frac13$ or right with probability $(1-\frac13)$, giving

\[P_3 = \frac13 P_2 + \left(1-\frac13\right) P_4.\]

If we hop from pad $2$ to pad $3$ then jump left twice to pad $1$, that happens with probability $\frac12\cdot\frac13\cdot\frac12 = \frac1{12},$ which shows that $P_2$ is at least $\frac12 + \frac1{12} = \frac{7}{12} \approx 0.583.$

Generalizing

Writing out the next few lilypads, we have the equations

\[\begin{align} P_4 &= \frac14 P_3 + \left(1-\frac14\right) P_5 \\ P_5 &= \frac15 P_4 + \left(1-\frac15\right) P_6 \\ P_6 &= \frac16 P_5 + \left(1-\frac16\right) P_7 \\ P_7 &= \frac17 P_6 + \left(1-\frac17\right) P_8 \\ \vdots \end{align}\]

and so on. Every lilypad is like this, so we can write and analyze a general lilypad equation:

\[P_j = \frac1j P_{j-1} + \left(1-\frac1j\right) P_{j+1}.\]

This connects three lilypads at a time, forward and backward, which is tough to solve directly for $P_j$. However, we might be able to massage it into an equation relating the two consecutive gaps (between $P_j$ and $P_{j-1}$, and between $P_{j+1}$ and $P_j$).

Solving the recursion

If we rewrite the left hand side as $\frac1j P_j + (1-\frac1j)P_j,$ we get

\[\frac1j P_j + (1-\frac1j)P_j = \frac1j P_{j-1} + \left(1-\frac1j\right) P_{j+1}\]

which simplifies to

\[P_{j} - P_{j+1} = \frac1{j-1}\left(P_{j-1} - P_j\right),\]

and we can recurses down to the base case $j=2$:

\[P_j - P_{j+1} = \frac{1}{(j-1)!}(P_1 - P_2).\]

From this we can find $P_2$.

Because the probabilities $P_j$ go to zero for large $j$, $P_1$ is equal to the telescoping series

\[\begin{align} P_1 &= (P_1 - P_2) + (P_2 - P_3) + (P_3 - P_4) + \ldots \\ &= \sum_{j=2}^\infty \frac{1}{(j-1)!}(P_1 - P_2) \\ &= (P_1 - P_2) \sum_{j=2}^\infty \frac1{(j-1)!} \\ &= e(P_1 - P_2). \end{align}\]

Again, if we start on pad $1$, we’re already there, so $P_1 = 1$ and we get

\[\boxed{P_2 = \frac{e-1}{e} \approx 0.632}.\]

While long trajectories are possible in principle, $92\%$ of the probability mass is contributed by the two shortest paths to pad $1$.